Another railway station for Cranbrook?

Just how big is Cranbrook going to be?

Just how are other towns and villages going to benefit from development in the East Devon if Cranbrook gets all the funding?

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/new-east-devon-railway-station-edges-closer/story-29491427-detail/story.html

A business too far for Axminster regeneration!

The photo graph of the scale of the factory is amazing but perhaps not quite the entrepreneurial vision Axminster is seeking!

http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/axminster-road-closed-after-cannabis-factory-discovered/story-29490906-detail/story.html

Honiton hustings for district council includes East Devon Alliance candidate


“Honiton residents will have the chance to quiz candidates for a district council seat in Honiton’s St Michael’s ward.

The opportunity comes off the back of Cllr David Foster’s sudden resignation.

Three candidates – all currently serving on Honiton Town Council – are set to attend a hustings at Honiton Methodist Hall, on Friday, July 15, from 2pm.

They are

Ashley Alder (UKIP),
Henry Brown (Labour) and
John Taylor (Independent East Devon Alliance)

June Brown, chair of Honiton Senior Voice, said: “We have been approached to hold a hustings because we have a proven track record over many years and because people want more information about candidates who present themselves.

“The district council controls many services and it is only right electors get the chance to meet and question those who wish to serve them as councillors. We are very pleased that with one exception the candidates have agreed to come along.”

For more information about Senior Voice and what the organisation does, visit http://www.devonseniorvoice

http://www.midweekherald.co.uk/news/hustings_to_quiz_next_district_councillor_for_honiton_1_4607829

MPs election expenses – not forgotten by Democratic Audit

Probably not good news for Police and Crime Commissioner Hernandez!

With all the constitutional chaos following the EU referendum result,
it’s easy to forget that up to 30 MPs are still being investigated for
breaking election spending limits by twenty police forces across the
country. But we’re still on the case!

Last week we hosted a meeting of politicians and campaigners to talk
about two things:

How can we bring MPs who have broken the rules to justice?
How can we fix the broken election expenses system?

Our friendly legal experts had some good news – there are legal options
to pursue MPs who have broken election spending limits even if the
police aren’t already investigating them! The allegations that the
police are already investigating could just be the tip of the iceberg in
this election expenses scandal.

It shouldn’t take a crack team of investigative journalists to keep our
elections fair and protect democracy. One big obstacle in the way of
holding MPs to account is that election expenses aren’t publicly
available. The only way you can access them is by going down to your
local council offices. We are working behind the scenes to change this
in time for the next general election (whenever that may be!) We will be
talking to the Electoral Commission to put pressure on local councils to
make this vital information available online.

With Brexit and Chilcot dominating the news, the election expenses
scandal could drop off the radar. We won’t let that happen.

Best wishes,

Alexandra Runswick
Director, Unlock Democracy

Parliament starts inquiry into housebuilding capacity

“The Communities and Local Government Committee has launched an inquiry into the capacity of the housebuilding industry to meet demand for new homes.

Inquiry: Capacity in the homebuilding industry
Communities and Local Government Committee
Purpose of the inquiry
The Committee is expected to invite the chief executives of major developers to give evidence.

Other areas to be covered by the inquiry include the role of small and medium-sized developers, the skills, size and sustainability of the workforce, the planning process and development finance.

The Committee also considers innovative ways of overcoming constraints on the industry, such as self-builds, off-site construction and direct commissioning by central Government.

The Committee is likely to invite ministers and representatives of industry bodies, the Homes and Communities Agency, local authorities and housing associations to give evidence in public. Skills and training experts, members of the off-site construction and self-build sectors and debt and equity financiers are also expected to be called.

Terms of reference

The Committee invites submissions of evidence on the following issues:

whether the numbers of builders and types of firms in the homebuilding industry is sufficient to meet housing demand

the structure of the homebuilding industry, in particular the role of small and medium-sized developers

housebuilders’ business models and how risk and uncertainty affect incentives to expand

the sustainability, size and skills of the building industry workforce
why fewer homes are being started and completed than the number of planning permissions being granted

the extent to which current planning approaches cause delays to the building of new homes

innovative approaches to increasing the housing supply, for example self-build, off-site construction and direct commissioning by central government and local housing companies

the role of development finance and how it can promote or constrain housing investment

The Committee would be grateful to receive written submissions by 12 September 2016. …

… Clive Betts MP, Chair of the Committee, said:

“The capacity of the homebuilding industry is a key factor in housing supply, which is simply not keeping up with demand and has left us in the midst of a crisis.

The Committee will cast a critical eye over the major homebuilders, examine the decline of small and medium-sized developers and look closely at the skills shortages, planning delays and finance issues hampering the industry.

Our wide-ranging inquiry will also explore alternative models, such as self-builds and off-site construction, to see if such innovative approaches to homebuilding can help address the country’s housing needs.”

http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/communities-and-local-government-committee/news-parliament-2015/homebuilding-launch-16-17/

Sidmouth: EDDC reasserts its authority over Port Royal

Probably stung by the popularity (and speed) of local residents who were able to organise and display interesting designs for Port Royal, EDDC has now announced funding for a scoping study (i.e. a PRE-study study) for the area. Not everyone is happy about the prospect:

“EDDC deputy chief executive Richard Cohen added: “Good proposals, which are innovative as well as practically and financially possible, will be critical to the success of Port Royal’s development.

“Throughout the process, there will be a clear focus on consultation and collaboration with local people, businesses and organisations, to ensure that any future development is achieved with their understanding.

“The improvements that this scheme will bring about will help maintain Sidmouth as one of the UK’s premier seaside resorts.”

But concerns were voiced at Monday’s town council meeting.

Councillor Ian McKenzie-Edwards said: “A lot of funding in Seaton came from Tesco. OK, it funded Seaton Jurassic, but two of the businesses it replaced were in tourism. Seaton is at a pretty low ebb. Tesco is a hell of a way of getting funding.”

Cllr Louise Cole welcomed the opportunity to regenerate eastern town, but said: “There’s a massive issue of trust between EDDC and the community.

“People are very concerned their voices aren’t heard. The two latest developments [the Knowle redevelopment and plans for a business park in Sidford] have reaffirmed that. People are extremely angry.”

Cllr Turner countered that people had always been cynical and it was up to the councils to try to involve them in the process.”

Mr Cohen expects the £10,000 project to be completed by mid-November, with a decision on the next step before Christmas.

http://www.sidmouthherald.co.uk/news/councils_scoping_out_future_of_port_royal_1_4608377

Hinkley C cost has risen to £37 billion

“The total lifetime cost of the planned Hinkley Point C nuclear power plant could be as high as £37bn, according to an assessment published by the UK government.

The figure was described as shocking by critics of the scheme, who said it showed just how volatile and uncertain the project had become given the same energy department’s cost figure of 12 months earlier had been £14bn.

The latest prediction comes amid increasing speculation about the future of the controversial project in Somerset, now beset by worries about whether Brexit financial jitters could further undermine it.

Hinkley has been a flagship energy project for the British government and the chancellor, George Osborne, in particular, who lobbied hard and successfully for China to take a stake in the scheme.

Officials at the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) on Thursday confirmed the £37bn figure but said it was a provisional, set in September 2015 when wholesale power prices were very low and would not affect bill payers. …

“… Critics of the scheme have claimed that the fall in the value of the pound since the referendum vote will increase the costs of the scheme to EDF’s French contractors, who work in higher cost euros. …

… The fall in power prices in the UK and continental Europe that have influenced the latest lifetime cost assessment for Hinkley is also responsible for some of the financial difficulties at EDF.

There have also been suggestions that Chinese investors are becoming more nervous about Hinkley and are demanding more concessions from EDF, so that more Chinese project managers and suppliers are involved. EDF denied this.”

http://gu.com/p/4z5ha

Hinkley C – or a 28 minute journey to Norwich?

Hinkley C or a journey from Exeter to London that takes 20 minutes?

California-based start-up Hyperloop One has unveiled a feasibility study for building a [300 mile] high speed Hyperloop transport network from Finland to Sweden for around £16.2 billion ($23 billion). The journey, which currently takes a 16 hour ferry journey or an hour by plane would take 28 minutes.

This would be the equivalent of a journey from Exeter to Norwich, 5 hours by non-stop car or also an hour by air.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3676845/Is-Hyperloop-coming-Europe-Super-fast-transport-cut-310-mile-trip-Helsinki-Stockholm-28-minutes.html

Swire for May, Parish for Leadsom – strict nanny v naughty nanny

Remainer Swire votes for Remainer May but says she is “monochrome” and is he supports her because she is not privileged.

Remainer Parish, the animal rights supporter, votes for Brexiter Leadsom who wants to bring back fox hunting.

source: http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/tory-devon-mps-split-as-swire-backs-may-and-parish-backs-leadsom/story-29488578-detail/story.html

So, Swire backs strict nanny,the vicar’s daughter who has published her tax returns when he says MPs tax returns(ie his) are no-one else’s business, whereas Parish backs naughty nanny (who refuses to publish her tax returns, was bankrolled by her hedge fund brother-in-law and had the rather elaborate cv that was later amended).

And East Devon Tories have to choose one or the other.

It just gets stranger and stranger.

All we need now is Corbyn to defect to the Tories.

EDDC draft villages plan – broken link in Cabinet agenda

Note that in the agenda for the next cabinet the draft plan for villages, which must be added to the Local Plan cannot be accessed from the link provided.

Nor can the pdf link be accessed from the page which takes you straight back to the agenda in a circular link.

There are some details about the results of consultations here:

http://eastdevon.gov.uk/planning/planning-policy/villages-plan/villages-plan-2016-consultation/

but it is suggested that each village checks what is being put before the Cabinet as it is not clear if each document is a summary of consultations or a recommendation – it simply labels documents “analysis”.

The villages involved are:

Beer
Broadclyst
Clyst St Mary
Colyton
East Budleigh
Feniton
Kilmington
Musbury
Newton Poppleford
Sidbury
Uplyme
West Hill
Whimple
Woodbury

Philip Skinner now Chairman of Exmouth Regeneration Board – we await his Christmas card …

See page 36:

RESOLVED; that Councillor Phillip Skinner be elected Chairman of the Board for the ensuing year.

Click to access cabinet130716combinedagenda.pdf

Councillor Skinner is probably best remembered for “Christmas card gate” when he was fired from his post as EDDC’s rural ” champion” during the reign of former EDDC Leader Chairman Sarah Randall-Johnson for sending her an inappropriate greeting:

CONSERVATIVE councillor has been stripped of his role as rural champion after off-the-cuff remarks in a Christmas card offended the leader of a Devon authority.

Philip Skinner, who represents Talaton, near Ottery St Mary, sent the card to Sara Randall Johnson, leader of East Devon District Council and headed it “My greatest adversary”. Mr Skinner heaped praise on her at the expense of other members, boasting: “The rest I can demolish in my sleep, but you are in a class of your own.”

Mr Skinner signed off with two footnotes, the last of which stated: “If only things had turned out different, we’d have made one hell of a team.”

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/tory-councillor-loses-role-greetings-card/story-11721863-detail/story.html

Unfortunately, we are not told what the first footnote was.

In the words of Tim Wannacott of Bargain Hunt: “Are you in charge of the sale today Philip? If so, we are in safe hands”.

Cabinet to rubber-stamp devolution deal with no consultation with members or public

“Heart of the South West Formal Devolution Bid (pages 52-56)

‘This report seeks approval to sign up ‘in principle’ to the pursuit of a Devolution Deal and the creation of a Combined Authority for the Heart of the South West sub- region to administer the powers devolved through the Deal. An ‘in principle’ agreement from all of the authorities, partners and MPs involved in the Heart of the South West devolution process will open up negotiations with Treasury to work towards a deal.”

Click to access cabinet130716combinedagenda.pdf

So, we got our “sovereignty” back …

“Education Secretary Nicky Morgan is to force through the appointment of her nomination for the next head of Ofsted, despite a cross-party committee of MPs saying they had “significant concerns”.

The Education Select Committee, scrutinising the appointment, rejected the choice of Amanda Spielman.

But Mrs Morgan is to override their finding and press ahead with her selection for the independent watchdog.

Mrs Morgan said Ms Spielman “will not shy away from challenging government”.
The education secretary said she was “disappointed that the committee underestimated Amanda’s vision, focus and leadership style. Her objectivity and openness are important strengths”.

Mrs Morgan said she was “100% confident” in her decision – and that “I am not seeking what one committee member described as a ‘crusader’.” …

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-36737123

Who will fund the Sidford Industrial Park post-Brexit?

Property funds that own offices, shops, industrial units and warehouses are freezing their assets as fundholders seek to remove their investments in them. In a recession, such properties are millstones, as they go quickly into negative equity and are hard to shift unless you do so at a loss.

Businesses contracting and cautious entrepreneurs no longer want accommodation and this leads to a glut of empty properties which exacerbates the problem.

In this climate, who would fund Sidford Fields and why?

What happens when you put Oliver Letwin in charge of Brexit policy

“Reassuringly, the man in charge of the government’s ‘Brexit unit’ is the go-to guy for not having a clue.

People have always called David Cameron a pragmatist, but the morning after the referendum he must have become a nihilist. Nothing else can explain the appointment of Oliver Letwin to lead the United Kingdom government’s Brexit unit. A prime minister who basically won an election by holding up Liam Byrne’s “I’m afraid there is no money” note has effectively dumped Oliver Letwin on to his successor’s desk – in all senses of that verb. I’m afraid there is no plan. I’m afraid there is Oliver Letwin.

Oliver Letwin! And come to that: unit! “Unit” implies a crack squad, an elite fighting force, a sort of A-Team meets Delta Force outfit whose moral grey areas are a trade-off with the extreme effectiveness best distilled in the famous Jack Nicholson speech in A Few Good Men. Deep down in places you don’t talk about at parties, you want that unit on the wall. You need that unit on the wall.

Instead, you’ve got Oliver Letwin. To fully absorb the fact Oliver Letwin is our guy at the sharp end of Brexit planning is to realise that even as the pound was nose-diving that first morning, we hadn’t reached rock bottom. There was a very deep concealed basement, into which we are only now beginning our journey.

Our tour guide is Oliver Letwin, a man whose chief claim to fame was once being the victim of one of those idiosyncratic Tory burglaries (see also Liam Fox). You know the sort of thing: when you let two strange men into your house at 5am in your pyjamas because they ask to use the loo, only to find – in a development that could only have been predicted by a computer the size of Los Alamos – that they nick your wallet. Or at least, that was Letwin’s chief claim to fame until last year’s declassification of a 1985 report he wrote for Margaret Thatcher in the wake of the Broadwater Farm riot, in which he suggested that social malaise was down to “bad moral attitudes” among black people, who would only re-route regeneration funding into the “disco and drug trade”. (He apologised when this came to light 30 years later.) …

… What’s the plan? “I’m trying to give you the truth,” Letwin twinkled terrifyingly, “which is that I have a completely open mind.” “Which is that you haven’t a clue.” Well of course he hasn’t. Oliver Letwin is your go-to guy if you want someone not to have a clue about something. In 2003, he pledged that a Tory government would automatically deport all asylum seekers to a foreign island “far, far away”. Where? He conceded he did not have “the slightest idea”. He is one remove beyond even Captain Hindsight, the South Park superhero whose speciality is showing up to disaster scenes and explaining what could have been done to avert them. Letwin is Captain I-Haven’t-the-Slightest-Idea. That’s the guy running the Brexit situation room.

“Why was there no mention of Brexit in the national security strategy?” wondered Blunt. “Because,” reasoned Letwin wholly unreasonably, “the government’s firm intent was to remain part of the EU.” And yet, for a government whose firm intent is not to be involved in a nuclear war, it sure has a lot of nuclear weapons. Perhaps it wishes to move to a situation where we wait to be hit by an intercontinental ballistic missile, then appoint Oliver to scratch around for some kind of plan for how to build a nuclear deterrent from the ashes. After all, the ever-upwardly-failing Letwin may be surely added to the list of things that would survive a nuclear holocaust.”

http://gu.com/p/4z3nh

Cranbrook – “Virtual Town Council Consultation Group”

“VIRTUAL TOWN COUNCIL CONSULTATION GROUP

Do you have something to say, but don’t have the time to attend meetings?

Do you have ideas about how to improve Cranbrook?

Do you have ideas about how you would like to see services provided, changed or improved? …

Then join our Virtual Town Council Consultation Group – which we are setting up in response to residents who have indicated that they would like to be involved in the future of the town but are unable to attend meetings or are unable to become a councillor.

As a member of the Virtual Group we will send you emails asking you for your opinions on a range of topics which will help us and partner organisations make decisions. You decide how often and when you would like to answer.
By becoming a member you will help the Town Council to provide an accessible and responsive service and you will be amongst the first to hear about news and updates.”

If you want to be part of this exciting initiative please email us at clerk@cranbrooktowncouncil.gov.uk. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjO-2O5Hmj8

But no mention of what happens when the “Virtual Consultation Group” overwhelmingly disagrees with the councillors!

The danger of whipping

Nathalie Bennett on the Chilcot Report:

“The government should immediately announce that all future military interventions will have unwhipped votes in the House of Commons. We must never again see MPs being cajoled into voting along party lines when their conscience tells them otherwise.”

Who guards the guards when the all the guards are in trouble?

This is the board of our Local Enterprise Partnership:

http://www.heartofswlep.co.uk/chief-executive-and-non-executive-directors

Post-Brexit, the vast majority of this board is having trouble: housebuilding slowing down, AgustaWestland talking of massive redundancies, universities losing EU funding and students, and many of them have cross-interests and common interests that are going to be very fragile (several have nuclear power interests).

How can we be sure that they will not put their own interests first in tough times when funding is tight?

If, given their interests, they had to decide between, say, supporting their direct or indirect business interests or supporting small and isolated rural communities which would you expect them to choose?

Exeter residents use neighbourhood plan to challenge “studentification”

Residents group Exeter’s St James Forum has issued judicial review proceedings against Exeter City Council in a dispute over ‘studentification’.

It opposes construction of a 320-bed student development near the St James Park football ground, which it argues is a breach of an agreed neighbourhood plan, which sought to change the balance of the locality by resisting the spread of student accommodation.

The neighbourhood plan was approved by a planning inspector and won the support of 92% of residents in a 2013 referendum, the forum said.
It was then adopted by the city council and became part of Exeter’s local development plan.

The Forum argues that the neighbourhood plan should “carry considerable weight” in any planning application in the St James area, as in April planning minster Brandon Lewis said in a letter to local MP Ben Bradshaw: “Where a planning application conflicts with a neighbourhood plan that had been brought into force, planning permission should not normally be granted.”

It asked the minister to call in the planning application, which forms part of Exeter City Football Club’s regeneration around its St James Park ground, in March but he declined to interfere with the council’s judgement on the matter.

A statement by the forum said it had been “left with little choice, other than on one hand to concede that the neighbourhood plan was a worthless document in so far as consideration of community balance was concerned or on the other hand stand up for the plan and the residents of St James”.

Exeter City Football Club said it was “bitterly disappointed” by the forum’s legal challenge.

Club chair Julian Tagg said: “Our efforts to work with the forum and find a compromise have been thrown back in our face by what appears to be a minority of individuals who, rather than engage in sensible and amicable discussion seem to be hell–bent on having a confrontation with the city council with the future of the football club as potential collateral damage.”

http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=27601%3Acouncil-faces-planning-judicial-review-challenge-over-studentification&catid=63&Itemid=31

Remove rural tourism red tape = more holiday lets for farmers!

Isn’t it just predictable that the givernment would think that tourism can only be improved by more holiday lets!

What about removing VAT on ALL tourist accommodation – as is the case in most of – you would never believe it! – Europe! What about not concreting over our green fields? What about not building houses on our beauty spots and AONBs? No – just let farmers (and other developers) build more!

“Rural campaigners have called for the abolition of planning red tape to help turn round a decline in the number of visitors to Devon and Cornwall’s glorious countryside.

The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (EFRA) Committee has announced that it will examine the reasons behind a national wane in visitors to the countryside.

Sarah Lee, head of policy at the Countryside Alliance, said tourism was vital to the economy of rural areas in the region and the Government needed to take action.

“Tourism is of enormous financial importance to rural areas like the Westcountry and it is alarming to see the market decline in this way,” she said.

“We welcome the Efra Select Committee inquiry into the problem and urge parliament to do everything it can to boost and support rural tourism.”

Ms Lee said the Government could act to “remove the red tape” that surrounds planning permission to make it easier for redundant farm buildings to get a new lease of life as holiday lets…. ”

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/remove-red-tape-call-to-boost-rural-tourism/story-29484249-detail/story.html